首页> 外文OA文献 >Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite
【2h】

Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite

机译:填充复合材料修复的牙科纳米复合材料的粘结强度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyze the bond strength of aged resin based nanocomposites repaired with the same and bulk fill composites. Seventy-two disc shaped resin composites consisted of three different nanocomposite resins (Filtek Ultimate/FU, Herculite XRV Ultra/HXRV, and Reflectys/R) were produced. After storing the samples for 8 weeks in distilled water, each material was combined with the same material or the bulk-fill composite resin system (Filtek Ultimate+Filtek Ultimate/Group-1; Filtek Ultimate+Tetric BF/Group-2; Herculite XRV+Herculite XRV/Group-3; Herculite XRV+Tetric BF/ Group-4; Reflectys+Reflectys/Group 5; Reflectys+Tetric BF/Group-6), for repair. Then specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing(SBS), and the debonded surfaces were examined. There was a significant difference among three materials(repaired with itself+bulk fill) for SBS testing values (p=0.001). FU and R were found to be similar, while HXRV was significantly different from them. A significant difference between group-1 and 2 (p=0.006) was detected, while there were no differences between group 3 and 4 (p= 0.142), and 5 and 6 (p=0.346). Among the six groups, repair SBS testing values with TBF were higher than repair with itself except for FU. The bulk-fill repaired materials showed higher bond strength except for FU, which showed the highest SBS value when repaired with itself. An increased incidence of adhesive fracture was observed at low strengths.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析用相同和整体填充复合材料修复的老化树脂基纳米复合材料的粘结强度。生产了由三种不同的纳米复合树脂(Filtek Ultimate / FU,Herculite XRV Ultra / HXRV和Reflectys / R)组成的72个盘状树脂复合材料。将样品在蒸馏水中保存8周后,将每种材料与相同材料或大容量填充复合树脂系统(Filtek Ultimate + Filtek Ultimate / Group-1; Filtek Ultimate + Tetric BF / Group-2; Herculite XRV + Herculite XRV / Group-3; Herculite XRV + Tetric BF / Group-4; Reflectys + Reflectys / Group 5; Reflectys + Tetric BF / Group-6),进行维修。然后对样品进行剪切粘结强度测试(SBS),并检查剥离的表面。三种材料之间的SBS测试值之间存在显着差异(经自身修复+填充)(p = 0.001)。发现FU和R相似,而HXRV与它们明显不同。在第1组和第2组之间检测到显着差异(p = 0.006),而在第3组和第4组之间(p = 0.142),第5组和第6组之间没有差异(p = 0.346)。在六组中,TBF修复的SBS测试值高于FU修复的自身。修补的散装材料显示出更高的粘结强度,而FU自身修复时具有最高的SBS值。在低强度下观察到粘合剂断裂的发生率增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号